Sharing of responsibility
This section looks at some tricky moments that aren’t solely dependent on what the clerk can or should do in certain circumstances. The principle to hold in mind is the three-way sharing of responsibility: the clerks are responsible for the process of the meeting, the meeting is collectively responsible for the content, and the elders are responsible for aiding in keeping the discipline and in upholding the clerks and the meeting.
If you hold this sharing carefully in mind it will help you work out what is yours to decide on or change, and what is not your area of responsibility. Most certainly you are there to do what the meeting wants, and to that end you really have to work to put your own feelings and opinions safely away in a box.
Clerks should try not to steer the meeting in one particular direction but remain open to many directions the meeting might be led. There can sometimes be a tussle during minute drafting, but if the meeting as an entity (that is to say, more than one influential Friend with a confident voice) wants something in the minute it’s your responsibility to note it down – through politely clenched teeth if necessary. If it seems to you that the sense of the meeting isn’t in unity with the apparent direction, someone will probably be led to say something on those lines if you allow enough time for the Spirit to dictate the pace. But if your meeting is being particularly passive at that point you can always ask them directly: ‘do you want this added in that way?’. A silence can be read as a Quaker ‘yes’.